- Ease Acoustic Simulation Software Install Where You#
- Ease Acoustic Simulation Software Software That Provides#
Ease Acoustic Simulation Software Software That Provides
At the upcoming Prolight Sound/Musikmesse in Frankfurt, AFMG will be releasing EASE version 4.4 acoustic simulation software that provides a host of upgrades.Click to expand.The general issue with modeling programs is getting data to put into them.EASE Focus 2 is a three-dimensional, acoustic simulation software for the configuration and modeling of line array systems, digitally steered array and conventional loudspeakers EASE Focus 2 is free for the VUE has licensed the al-4, al-8 and h-class family of products to for use in EASE Focus 2.0 and above.Do you mean noise free environment or absence of any acoustic signals Or concert hall with good acoustic properties If the last one, Ease could be good choice.And then what about the quality of the data and how much it has been "modified" (yes it happens).There are various programs from some manufacturers-but often they can only use the manufacturers data.It also depends on what you "expect" out of the model. Patty Glissendorf on TOPEase Acoustic Software Cracking. This is an example of how to use. EASE v4.1 is an acoustic simulation software program designed for the Windows operating system that provides sound system designers an invaluable tool for predicting the performance of a sound system in a given venue. Ease Acoustic Software Crack Works. Dubstep Software Free Download For Mac.
Ease Acoustic Simulation Software Install Where You
Build a system in a model. The higher end installs there's not much of a problem with, its when I have a budget install where you need to redeploy or add to a current system, that is where i get the hang ups at.It all depends on the data-where it came from-how much you trust it-how it was gathered and so forth.Not an easy question to answer or get answered.You could start with asking the manufacturer directly a couple of questions and hope they tell the truth-or if the person you are asking even knows the truth or is simply "repeating the company line".To what resolution was the data measured? degrees and octavesWere the "clusters" in the data actually measured as a cluster or was a cluster "put together" in the model?Has there been any manipulation of the measured data? THAT is the TOUGH hard question that will be hard to get an honest answer to.Of course you can also do it the CORRECT way. Reading CLF data is a must. I have only run into a situation 1 time in the last year that i really needed to provide acoustical treatment and i had that taken care of by a manufacture, so thats not on the top of my priority but would be nice.The things i'm really looking for is to be able to provide coverage graphs/images for customers, and to look at the best places to put a clusters/delay clusters when needed. For example, I may use a manufacturer's array software to develop a preliminary array concept but then import that information into EASE to look at the results in more detail in the actual predicted environment, then going back and forth to tweak the results.Ivan, i have taken some time this weekend and looked at some spec's/graphs and now every time i look at one i'm going to be asking myself how much smoothing and where are the points of smoothing/averaging, thanks for making my life much tougher.Brad, most of what I have been doing is church and bar installs, the short story is that a local audio guy is retiring from the business and trying to give me his long term customers before he completly gets out, most of these are installs that have been done in the mid-late 90's that need updated. Manufacturer specific software can be useful but I find it rarely allows you to look at things if three dimensions or to consider the effects of the acoustical environment.
That and having products that actually do what the specs say they do (ESPECIALLY in the coverage angle department) makes a real difference.It is very important to look at a wide range of freq -NOT just a single freq-to get an idea of what the overall system coverage is.There are a few other modeling programs out there. But rather I use the model to get aiming angles-locations etc. And even if the data has been "fudged"-it is still better (faster-more accurate-easier) than trying to do it with pen and paper.Of course part of the whole "process" is knowing the products used and getting a feel for how they "react" in a real room.By knowing the product-it is much easier to put together a design that works.Very rarely do I change products in a design because of what the model shows me. If they don't then try to figure out why-and ask the manufacturer why they don't.But who has the time or budget for that-There is real value in the prediction software-if the data entered is good. Then do a lot of measurements and VERIFY the results.Compare the prediction to the actual measured results and see how well they compare.
Other modeling programs out there are CATT Acoustic CATT-Acoustic / The FIReverb Suite (Free Demo available) and ODEON Acoustics Simulation Software | Odeon (very expensive).
0 kommentar(er)
